home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: "Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip.org/" <ncm@cantrip.org>
- Message-ID: <314FA95C.2F38755E@cantrip.org>
- X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:44:44 -0800
- Path: in1.uu.net!bounce-back
- Date: 21 Mar 96 10:49:26 GMT
- Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: static_cast
- Organization: The Cantrip Cooperative
- References: <gkng2b584f4.fsf@bmtlh30.nortel.ca>
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i386)
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBFAgUBMVE0UOEDnX0m9pzZAQFZTgF+PKjVpZ2iBYNGCExLImT8yaeK4AAuKrwY
- pi1BclHWz5RA6iht3+s8TMGmCLkFBW5R
- =L1hg
-
- linh (l.) dang wrote:
-
- > Since static_cast is not always safe, did anyone consider a set of
- > implicit_cast<T> template functions as part of the standard library ?
-
- They were considered at the meeting in Tokyo (Nov. '95) but
- rejected as an extension proposal that arrived just too late.
- (I gather they were left out of the proposal for the original
- suite of casts because they could be implemented in the library,
- but nobody got around to proposing them to the library group
- until too late.)
-
- If they find wide use they might be added to the next C++ standard.
-
- > These functions are efficient, safe and might be the fatal blow to the
- > old-style cast.
-
- One can dream, at least.
-
- Nathan Myers
- ncm@cantrip.org http://www.cantrip.org/
- ---
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-